Iranian Journal of Veterinary Surgery

Iranian Journal of Veterinary Surgery

Estimating Endocranial Volume in the Domestic Cat (Felis catus) Using Computed Tomography

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Ebru Eravci Yalin 1
Sedat Aydoğdu 2
Ozan Gündemir 3
Mehmet Saadeddin Öztürk 4
Margot Michaud 5, 6
1 Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkiye.
2 Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkiye.
3 Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkiye.
4 Bioengineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkiye.
5 Evolution and Diversity Dynamics Lab, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
6 Department of African Zoology, Royal Museum for Central Africa, Tervuren, Belgium.
10.30500/ivsa.2024.482729.1418
Abstract
Changes in brain and endocranial volume size are observed in most mammals during domestication. However, while much attention has been paid to comparing domesticated species with their wild relatives, few studies have focused on the differences between domesticated breeds, especially in cats. In this study, we estimated the endocranial volume of two different domestic cat breeds (Felis catus) using virtual endocasts obtained from computed tomography (CT) images. Our analysis did not reveal any significant differences between the British Shorthair and the Scottish Fold domestic breeds in terms of endocranial volume. In addition, we found similar results with volumes previously obtained from domestic cats using bead methods. Although these results represent only a limited sample of the entire cat breed diversity, we hope they will contribute to our understanding of the macroevolutionary changes in brain volume during domestication.
Keywords
Computed tomography
Endocranial volume
Felis catus
Virtual endocast

Subjects

  1. Driscoll Carlos A, Clutton-Brock J, Kitchener AC, O’Brien SJ. The taming of the cat. Genetic and archaeological findings hint that wildcats became housecats earlier--and in a different place--than previously thought. Scientific American. 2009; 300(6): 68–75.
  2. Trouwborst A, McCormack PC, Martínez Camacho E. 2020. Domestic cats and their impacts on biodiversity: A blind spot in the application of nature conservation law. People and Nature. 2020; 2(1): 235–250. doi: 10.1002/pan3.10073
  3. Woolley LA, Murphy BP, Geyle HM, Legge SM, Palmer RA, Dickman CR, Doherty TS, Edwards GP, Riley J, Turpin JM, Woinarski JCZ. 2020. Introduced cats eating a continental fauna: Invertebrate consumption by feral cats (Felis catus) in Australia. Wildlife Research. 2020; 47(8): 610–623. doi: 10.1071/WR19197
  4. Driscoll Carlos A, Macdonald DW, O’Brien SJ. An evolutionary view of domestication. The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009; 106: 9971–9978. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901586106
  5. Driscoll CA, Menotti-Raymond M, Roca AL, Hupe K, Johnson WE, Geffen E, Harley EH, Delibes M, Pontier D, Kitchener AC, Yamaguchi N, O’Brien SJ, Macdonald DW. The near eastern origin of cat domestication. 2007; 317(5837): 519–523. doi: 10.1126/science.1139518
  6. Ottoni C, Van Neer W, De Cupere B, Daligault J, Guimaraes S, Peters J, Spassov N, Prendergast ME, Boivin N, Morales-Muñiz A, Bălăşescu A, Becker C, Benecke N, Boroneant A, Buitenhuis H, Chahoud J, Crowther A, Llorente L, Manaseryan N, Monchot H, Onar V, Osypińska M, Putelat O, Quintana Morales EM, Studer J, Wierer U, Decorte R, Grange T, Geigl E-M. The palaeogenetics of cat dispersal in the ancient world. Nature Ecology and Evolution. 2017; 1: 0139. doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0139
  7. Clutton-Brock JA. Natural history of domesticated mammals, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.1999.
  8. Reig S, Daniels MJ, Macdonald DW.Craniometric differentiation within wild-living cats in Scotland using 3D morphometrics. Journal of Zoology. 2001; 253(01): 121–132. doi: 10.1017/S0952836901000115
  9. Morris D. Cat world: A feline encyclopedia, 1st ed. Penguin Reference. 1997.
  10. Röhrs M, Ebinger P.Die Beurteilung von Hirngrößenunterschieden zwischen Wild- und Haustieren. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research. 2009; 16(1): 1–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0469.1978.tb00916.x
  11. Balcarcel AM, Geiger M, Clauss M, Sánchez-Villagra MR. The mammalian brain under domestication: Discovering patterns after a century of old and new analyses. Journal of Experimental Zoology. Part B, Molecular and Developmental Evolution. 2022; 338(8): 460-483. doi: 10.1002/jez.b.23105
  12. Balcarcel AM, Sánchez-Villagra MR, Segura V, Evin A. Singular patterns of skull shape and brain size change in the domestication of South American camelids. Journal of Mammalogy. 2021; 102(1): 220–235. doi: 10.1093/jmammal/gyaa135
  13. Klatt B. Uber die Veranderung der sehaedelkapazitat in der domestikation. Sitzungsbericht: Gesellschaft naturforschender Freunde. 1912; 3: 153-179.
  14. Rohrs M. Vergleichende untersuchungen an wild- und haus-katzen. Zoologischer Anzeiger. 1955; 155: 53–69.
  15. Röhrs M, Ebinger P. Die Beurteilung von hirngrößenunterschieden zwischen wild- und haustieren. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research. 1978; 16(1): 1–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0469.1978.tb00916.x
  16. Herre W, Röhrs M. Haustiere-zoologisch gesehen (Compendium of basic data). 1978.
  17. Colby AE, Kimock CM, Higham JP. Endocranial volume is variable and heritable, but not related to fitness, in a free-ranging primate. Scientific Reports. 2021; 11(1): 1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81265-w
  18. Finarelli JA. Estimating endocranial volume from the outside of the skull in Artiodactyla. Journal of Mammalogy. 2011; 92(1): 200–212. doi: 10.1644/09-MAMM-A-391.1
  19. Logan CJ, Clutton-Brock TH. Validating methods for estimating endocranial volume in individual red deer (Cervus elaphus). Behavioural Processes. 2013; 92: 143–146. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.10.015
  20. Benson-Amram, S., Dantzer, B., Stricker, G., Swanson, E.M., Holekamp, K.E., 2016. Brain size predicts problem-solving ability in mammalian carnivores. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2016; 113(9): 2532–2537. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1505913113
  21. González-Lagos C, Sol D, Reader SM. Large-brained mammals live longer. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 2010; 23(5): 1064–1074. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.01976.x
  22. Sol D, Bacher S, Reader SM, Lefebvre L. Brain size predicts the success of mammal species introduced into novel environments. American Naturalist. 2008; 172: 63-71. doi: 10.1086/588304
  23. Agnvall B, Bélteky, J, Jensen P. Brain size is reduced by selection for tameness in Red Junglefowl-correlated effects in vital organs. Scientific Reports. 2017; 7(1): 3306. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03236-4
  24. Finarelli JA. Estimation of endocranial volume through the use of external skull measures in the Carnivora (Mammalia). Journal of Mammalogy. 2006; 87(5): 1027–1036. doi: 0.1644/05-MAMM-A-430R1.1
  25. Stuermer IW, Wetzel W. Early experience and domestication affect auditory discrimination learning, open field behaviour and brain size in wild Mongolian gerbils and domesticated laboratory gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus forma domestica). Behavioural Brain Research. 2006; 173(1): 11–21. doi: 0.1016/j.bbr.2006.05.025
  26. Lesch R, Kitchener AC, Hantke G, Kotrschal K, Fitch WT. Cranial volume and palate length of cats, Felis spp., under domestication, hybridization and in wild populations. Royal Society Open Science. 2022; 9(1): 210477. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210477
  27. Czeibert K, Sommese A, Petneházy O, Csörgő T, Kubinyi E. Digital endocasting in comparative canine brain morphology. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2020, 7: 1–13. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.565315
  28. Falk D, Redmond JC, Guyer J, Conroy GC, Recheis W, Weber GW, Seidler H. Early hominid brain evolution: A new look at old endocasts. Journal of Human Evolution. 2000; 38(5): 695–717. doi: 10.1006/jhev.1999.0378
  29. Kubo D, Kono RT, Saso A, Mizushima S, Suwa G. Accuracy and precision of CT-based endocranial capacity estimations: A comparison with the conventional millet seed method and application to the Minatogawa 1 skull. Anthropological Science. 2008; 116(1): 77–85. doi: 10.1537/ase.070502
  30. Wu X, Schepartz LA. Application of computed tomography in paleoanthropological research. Progress in Natural Science. 2009; 19(8): 913–921. doi: 10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.10.009
  31. Boistel R, Swoger J, Kržič U, Fernandez V, Gillet B, Reynaud EG. The future of three-dimensional microscopic imaging in marine biology. Marine Ecology. 2011; 32(4): 438–452. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0485.2011.00442.x
  32. Bruner E, Ogihara N, Tanabe HC. Digital endocasts. From skulls to brains, Replacement of Neanderthals by Modern Humans Series. 2018.
  33. Carril J, Tambussi CP, Degrange FJ, Benitez Saldivar MJ, Picasso MBJ. Comparative brain morphology of Neotropical parrots (Aves, Psittaciformes) inferred from virtual 3D endocasts. Journal of Anatomy. 2016; 229(2): 239–251. doi: 10.1111/joa.12325
  34. Demircioğlu İ, Kocyigit A, Aydogdu S, Gezer İnce N, Yılmaz B. Calculation of the intracranial volume in gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa) by stereology and computed tomography. Harran Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 2021; 10(2): 178–183. doi: 10.31196/huvfd.1005996
  35. Yilmaz O, Demircioğlu İ. Examination of the morphometric features and three-dimensional modelling of the skull in van cats by using computed tomographic images. Ankara Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi. 2021; 68(3): 213–222. doi: 10.33988/auvfd.775971
  36. Ramos J, Viegas I, Pereira H, Requicha JF. Morphometrical study of the European shorthair cat skull using computed tomography. Veterinary Sciences. 2021; 8(8): 161. doi: 10.3390/vetsci8080161
  37. Holloway RL.The Relevance of endocasts for studying primate brain evolution, In: Noback CR. Ed., Sensory Systems of Primates. Springer, New York, USA, 1978; 181–200.
  38. Bertolini F, Gandolfi B, Kim ES, Haase B, Lyons LA, Rothschild MF. Evidence of selection signatures that shape the Persian cat breed. Mammalian Genome. 2016; 27(3-4): 144–155. doi: 10.1007/s00335-016-9623-1
  39. Lipinski MJ, Froenicke L, Baysac KC, Billings NC, Leutenegger CM, Levy AM, Longeri M, Niini T, Ozpinar H, Slater MR, Pedersen NC, Lyons LA. The ascent of cat breeds: Genetic evaluations of breeds and worldwide random-bred populations. 2008; 91(1): 12–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2007.10.009
  40. Menotti-Raymond M, David VA, Pflueger SM, Lindblad-Toh K, Wade CM, O’Brien SJ, Johnson WE. Patterns of molecular genetic variation among cat breeds. 2008; 91(1): 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2007.08.008
  41. Salonen M, Vapalahti K, Tiira K, Mäki-Tanila A, Lohi H. Breed differences of heritable behaviour traits in cats. Scientific Reports. 2019; 9(1): 1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44324-x
  42. Gandolfi B, Alamri S, Darby WG, Adhikari B, Lattimer JC, Malik R, Wade CM, Lyons LA, Cheng J, Bateman JF, McIntyre P, Lamandé SR, Haase B. A dominant TRPV4 variant underlies osteochondrodysplasia in Scottish fold cats. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016; 24(8): 1441–1450. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.03.019
  43. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. Biometry: The principles and practice of statistic in biological research. W.H. Freeman, New York, USA; 1995.
  44. Dane S, Tan U. Relation of brain weight to body weight in cats to sex and paw preferences: Anomalous results in left-preferent cats. International Journal of Neuroscience. 1991; 62(1-2): 75–80. doi: 10.3109/00207459108999759
  45. Balcarcel AM, Sánchez-Villagra MR, Segura V, Evin A. Singular patterns of skull shape and brain size change in the domestication of South American camelids. Journal of Mammalogy. 2021; 102(1): 220–235. doi: 10.1093/jmammal/gyaa135
  46. Balcarcel AM, Veitschegger K, Clauss M, Sánchez-Villagra MR. Intensive human contact correlates with smaller brains: Differential brain size reduction in cattle types. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2021; 288(1952): 20210813. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0813
  47. Kruska D. Volumenvergleich optischer Hirnzentren bei Wild- und Hausschweinen. Zeitschrift Fur Anatomie Und Entwicklungsgeshichte. 2004; 138: 265–282.
  48. Röhrs M, Ebinger P. Die beurteilung von hirngrößenunterschieden zwischen wild‐ und haustieren. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research. 1978; 16(1): 1–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0469.1978.tb00916.x
  49. Kruska D. Vergleichend cytoarchitektonische untersuchungen an gehirnen von wild- und hausschweinen. Anatomy and Embriology. 1970; 131, 291–324.
  50. Ebinger P. A cytoarchitectonic volumetric comparison of the area gigantopyramidalis in wild and domestic sheep. Anatomy and Embryology. 1975; 147(2): 167–175. doi: 10.1007/BF00306731
  51. Yamaguchi N, Kitchener AC, Gilissen E, MacDonald DW.Brain size of the lion (Panthera leo) and the tiger (P. tigris): Implications for intrageneric phylogeny, intraspecific differences and the effects of captivity. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2009; 98(1): 85–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2009.01249.x
  52. Isler K, Christopher Kirk E, Miller JMA, Albrecht GA, Gelvin BR, Martin RD. Endocranial volumes of primate species: scaling analyses using a comprehensive and reliable data set. Journal of Human Evolution. 2008; 55(6): 967-978. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.08.004
  53. Turschwell MP, White CR, The effects of laboratory housing and spatial enrichment on brain size and metabolic rate in the eastern mosquitofish, Gambusia Holbrooki. Biology Open. 2016; 5(3):205-210. doi: 10.1242/bio.015024
  54. Welniak–Kaminska M, Fiedorowicz M, Orzel J, Bogorodzki P, Modlinska K, Stryjek R, Chrzanowska A, Pisula W, Grieb P. Volumes of brain structures in captive wild-type and laboratory rats: 7T magnetic resonance in vivo automatic atlas-based study. PLoS One. 2019; 14(4): e0215348. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215348
  55. Cardini A, Elton S. Sample size and sampling error in geometric morphometric studies of size and shape. 2007; 126(2): 121–134. doi: 10.1007/s00435-007-0036-2
  56. Schmidt MJ, Kampschulte M, Enderlein S, Gorgas D, Lang J, Ludewig E, Fischer A, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Schaubmar AR, Failing K, Ondreka N. The relationship between brachycephalic head features in modern Persian cats and dysmorphologies of the skull and internal hydrocephalus. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine. 2017; 31(5): 1487–1501. doi: 10.1111/jvim.1480

  • Receive Date 10 October 2024
  • Revise Date 09 November 2024
  • Accept Date 30 November 2024
  • First Publish Date 30 November 2024